Back to search

Article

Measuring appearance-related comparisons: Validation of the Comparison Standards Scale for Appearance

2022-09-02

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p><bold>Background</bold> Humans constantly compare their attributes to different reference frames. According to the theoretical framework of the general comparative-processing model, such comparisons may be perceived as aversive (i.e., appraised as threatening the motives of the comparer) or appetitive (i.e., appraised as consonant with, or positively challenging the motives). However, w...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
027fcfc3-4658-516b-8301-5cae31f8f4e0
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-1862654/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Measuring appearance-related comparisons: Validation of the Comparison Standards Scale for AppearanceDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1862654/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.