Back to search

Article

Using geometric and non-geometric internal evaluators to compare eight vegetation classification methods

2008-08-01

Abstract excerpt

Questions: How similar are solutions of eight commonly used vegetation classification methods? Which classification methods are most effective according to classification validity evaluators? How do evaluators with different optimality criteria differ in their assessments of classification efficacy? In particular, do evaluators which use geometric criteria (e.g. cluster compactness) and non-geometric evaluators (w...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
01b9c9e6-4f8e-55d2-939b-08b604e4e4eb
DOI
10.3170/2008-8-18406
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Using geometric and non-geometric internal evaluators to compare eight vegetation classification methodsDOI 10.3170/2008-8-18406
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.