Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

The role of different pedigree structures on the sampling variance of heritability estimates.

Journal of animal science - 1 Sept 1997

Reverter A, Kaiser C J

Abstract excerpt

A computer-intensive process was performed to simulate 12,600 data sets each with n = 5,000 individuals from distinct pedigree structures to assess the effect of pedigree information on the sampling variance of heritability (h2) estimates. Pedigree structures were determined by varying the proportion of foundation animals (PF), percentage replacement rates for males (RM) and females (RF), and ratio of females to...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Algorithms
Share to Breeding
Share to Computer Simulation

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Variation

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Models, Statistical

Share to Pedigree

Share to Seasons

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 9303453
DOI: 10.2527/1997.7592355x

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The role of different pedigree structures on the sampling variance of heritability estimates.PMID 9303453Read ↗

Approximate confidence intervals for heritability from method R estimates.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A general unified framework to assess the sampling variance of heritability estimates using pedigree or marker-based relationships.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pedigree-free estimates of heritability in the wild: promising prospects for selfing populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison between estimation of breeding values and fixed effects using Bayesian and empirical BLUP estimation under selection on parents and missing pedigree information.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Inversion of a part of the numerator relationship matrix using pedigree information.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pedigrees as a source of information in mtDNA studies of dogs and horses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Molecular pedigree reconstruction and estimation of evolutionary parameters in a wild Atlantic salmon river system with incomplete sampling: a power analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic parameters of body weight traits in Mithun (Bos frontalis) using animal model.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of genomic selection and genotyping strategy on estimation of variance components in animal models using different relationship matrices.Semantic proximity Read ↗

How pedigree errors affect genetic evaluations and validation statistics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Methods to estimate effective population size using pedigree data: Examples in dog, sheep, cattle and horse.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Variance estimates are similar using pedigree or genomic relationships with or without the use of metafounders or the algorithm for proven and young animals1.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.