Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Missing comparability: When genomic selection faces field variability. A case study in soybeans.

The plant genome - 1 Jun 2026

Caballero Edmundo, Garcia-Abadillo Julian, Jarquin Diego

Abstract excerpt

The processing of phenotypic information prior to training genomic selection (GS) models is a key factor that is frequently overlooked. Several approaches have been proposed to isolate the genetic signal from the field variability. However, in most cases, the estimated genetic signal still carries the field variability print. In addition, the statistical metrics are not conclusive about the model that isolates...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Computer Simulation
Share to Genome, Plant
Share to Genomics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Glycine max

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Phenotype

Share to Plant Breeding

Share to Selection, Genetic

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 42283372
DOI: 10.1002/tpg2.70264
PMCID: PMC13261800

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Missing comparability: When genomic selection faces field variability. A case study in soybeans.PMID 42283372Read ↗

Impact of environmental covariates summarization on predictive ability in genomic selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improving hybrid breeding efficiency in winter oilseed rape under sparse multi-environment testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sparse testing using genomic prediction improves selection for breeding targets in elite spring wheat.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Strategies for implementing genomic selection in a public soybean breeding program.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Integrative machine learning approach for identifying genes associated with quantitative traits: A soybean (Glycine max) yield case study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Penalized Regression Method for Genomic Prediction Reduces Mismatch between Training and Testing Sets.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prospects of Genomic Prediction in the USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection: Historical Data Creates Robust Models for Enhancing Selection of Accessions.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The importance of phenotypic data analysis for genomic prediction - a case study comparing different spatial models in rye.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic selection performs as effectively as phenotypic selection for increasing seed yield in soybean.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Statistical sampling of missing environmental variables improves biophysical genomic prediction in wheat.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Spatial modelling improves genetic evaluation in smallholder breeding programsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Megavariate methods capture complex genotype-by-environment interactions.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.