Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Misinterpreting the results: patient misconceptions about genetic cancer risk after obstetrical carrier screening.

Familial cancer - 18 Feb 2026

Raghunandan Alex, Iyer Sonali, Dioun Shayan, Scholl Jessica, Kalish Robin B, Primiano Michelle, Ozarowski Amanda Laterza, Sharaf Ravi N, Frey Melissa K

Abstract excerpt

Obstetric carrier screening (OCS) is recommended for all individuals during pregnancy by leading professional societies. However, patient understanding of the scope and limitations of OCS remains poorly characterized, especially with regards to inclusion of cancer-related genes on OCS panels. This quality improvement initiative evaluated pregnant patients' knowledge of their OCS results. We contacted 100 pregnant...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Genetic Carrier Screening
Share to Genetic Counseling

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Share to Neoplasms

Share to Pregnancy

Share to Prenatal Diagnosis

Share to Risk Assessment

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 41706374
DOI: 10.1007/s10689-026-00536-5

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Misinterpreting the results: patient misconceptions about genetic cancer risk after obstetrical carrier screening.PMID 41706374Read ↗

Misinterpreting the Results: Patient Misconceptions about Genetic Cancer Risk after Obstetrical Carrier Screening Shortened Title: Perceptions of Genetic Cancer Risk in Prenatal Carrier ScreeningSemantic proximity Read ↗

Ethical considerations in prenatal genomic testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical Utility of Expanded Carrier Screening: Results-Guided Actionability and OutcomesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Accuracy and ambiguity in counseling patients about genetic risk.Semantic proximity Read ↗

“Something Extra on Chromosome 5”: Parents’ Understanding of Positive Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) ResultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical Utility of Expanded Carrier Screening: Reproductive Behaviors of At-Risk CouplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Ethical and Practical Considerations in Implementing Population-Based Reproductive Genetic Carrier ScreeningSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic Counselors' Experiences Regarding Communication of Reproductive Risks with Autosomal Recessive Conditions found on Cancer Panels.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical Utility of Expanded Carrier Screening: Reproductive Behaviors of At‐Risk CouplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Expanded carrier screening in reproductive healthcare: perspectives from genetics professionalsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Pitfalls and challenges in genetic test interpretation: An exploration of genetic professionals experience with interpretation of resultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Views of American OB/GYNs on the ethics of prenatal whole‐genome sequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.