Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

A scalable new model of germline cancer genomic care delivery: Assessing psychological outcomes.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics - 1 May 2026

Solomon Ilana B, Boyd Patrick, Xiao Yi, Dang Kathryn R, Mochizuki Ashley, Currey Madeline, Garcia Michael, Luong Marilan, Cheung Frances, Gruber Stephen B, Hampel Heather, Labib Sarah, Mak Angela, Qiao Ran, Tang Sarah, Davey Sandra, Gray Stacy W

Abstract excerpt

PURPOSE: New care models promise to increase access to germline genetic testing. To decrease testing gaps, we offered universal germline testing without pretest genetic counseling to unselected patients at a comprehensive cancer center. To address safety concerns over the elimination of pretest counseling, we examined detrimental psychological impact (DPI) after participants underwent testing in this novel model....

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Delivery of Health Care
Share to Genetic Counseling

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genomics

Share to Germ Cells

Share to Germ-Line Mutation

Share to Neoplasms

Share to Surveys and Questionnaires

Share to Uncertainty

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 41691543
DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2026.102537

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

A scalable new model of germline cancer genomic care delivery: Assessing psychological outcomes.PMID 41691543Read ↗

Psychosocial and behavioral outcomes of genomic testing in cancer: a systematic review.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Distress, uncertainty, and positive experiences associated with receiving information on personal genomic risk of melanoma.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Uptake and acceptability of a mainstreaming model of hereditary cancer multigene panel testing among patients with ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Psychosocial outcomes following germline multigene panel testing in an ethnically and economically diverse cohort of patientsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Outcomes from a Novel Approach to Studying Consumer Genetic Testing for Germline Cancer and Cardiovascular Risk.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cancer-Related Genetic Testing and Personalized Medicine for Adolescents: A Narrative Review of Impact and Understanding.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Population Genomic Screening for Hereditary Cancer Risk: Patient Experience, Perceptions, and Downstream Clinical Outcomes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetics healthcare providers' experiences counseling patients with results from consumer genomic testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Informing models of cancer genetics care in the era of multigene panel testing with patient-led recommendations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Knowledge and psychosocial impact of genetic counseling and multigene panel testing among individuals with ovarian cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Consent for Genetic Testing Using an Oncologist- or Genetic Counselor-Mediated Model of CareSemantic proximity Read ↗

Attitudes of patients with cancer about personalized medicine and somatic genetic testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.