Impact of histologically poorly cohesive phenotype as a prognostic factor in patients with pStage II/III gastric cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy.

doi:10.1007/s10120-025-01599-6

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Community

Back to search

Article

Impact of histologically poorly cohesive phenotype as a prognostic factor in patients with pStage II/III gastric cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy.

Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association - 1 May 2025

Kunisaki Chikara, Sato Sho, Kasahara Kohei, Sato Tsutomu, Yago Akikazu, Tamura Yuko, Kondo Hiroki, Oshi Masanori, Kosaka Takashi, Akiyama Hirotoshi, Endo Itaru

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Few studies have focussed on using histological phenotype to evaluate prognostic factors after adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with pStage II/III gastric cancer. We evaluated the impact of histological type based on the World Health Organization classification. METHODS: Overall, 348 patients with pStage II/III advanced gastric cancer undergoing R0 gastrectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Carcinoma, Signet Ring Cell

Share to Chemotherapy, Adjuvant

Share to Follow-Up Studies

Share to Gastrectomy

Share to Neoplasm Staging

Share to Stomach Neoplasms

Share to Survival Rate

Source

Open in PubMed

Identifiers

PMID: 40019627
DOI: 10.1007/s10120-025-01599-6

Genes

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 9 closest

Impact of histologically poorly cohesive phenotype as a prognostic factor in patients with pStage II/III gastric cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy.PMID 40019627Read ↗

Impact of histologically poorly cohesive phenotype as a prognostic factor in patients with pStage II/III gastric cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapySemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical Significance of coexisting histological diffuse type in stage II/III gastric cancer: A retrospective studySemantic proximity Read ↗

FGFR2 and favorable survival outcomes in resected poorly cohesive cell gastric cancer: Analysis from FGFR2 protein overexpression and genetic variation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Phenotypic classification of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma and its relationship with clinicopathologic parameters and prognosis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The contribution of cell phenotype to the behavior of gastric cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Criterios de selección y factores pronósticos para la cirugía citorreductora (CRS) más quimioterapia intraperitoneal hipertérmica (HIPEC) en el cáncer gástrico con metástasis peritoneales: una revisión sistemáticaSemantic proximity Read ↗

The prognostic significance of the mucin phenotype of gastric adenocarcinoma and its relationship with histologic classifications.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Clinicopathological evaluation of biological behavior of submucosal invasive gastric carcinomas: relationship among lymph node metastasis, mucin phenotype and proliferative activity.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Papillary phenotype confers improved survival after resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.