Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparing 5-year and 10-year predicted cardiovascular disease risks in Aotearoa New Zealand: national data linkage study of 1.7 million adults

4 Nov 2024

Abstract excerpt

AIMS: There is no consensus on the optimal time horizon for predicting cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk to inform treatment decisions. New Zealand and Australia recommend 5 years, whereas most countries recommend 10 years. We compared predicted risk and treatment-eligible groups using 5-year and 10-year equations. METHODS AND RESULTS: Individual-level linked administrative data sets identified 1 746 665 New...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Share to Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 39506551
DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae361

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparing 5-year and 10-year predicted cardiovascular disease risks in Aotearoa New Zealand: national data linkage study of 1.7 million adultsPMID 39506551Read ↗

Development and validation of alternative cardiovascular risk prediction equations for population health planning: a routine health data linkage study of 1.7 million New ZealandersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Differences in estimates for ten-year risk of cardiovascular disease in Black versus white persons with identical risk factor profiles using pooled cohort equationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Distribution of cardiovascular disease risk based on the updated 2023 guideline-recommended Australian cardiovascular disease risk algorithm and comparison with the 2012 algorithmSemantic proximity Read ↗

Appraising Cardiovascular 10-yr Risk Prediction Scores: A Rapid Systematic ReviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cardiovascular risk scores for primary prevention: head-to-head validation of 16 established and contemporary modelsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Development and validation of a next-gen health stratification engine to determine risk for multiple cardiovascular diseasesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Actionable absolute risk prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a behavior-management approach based on data from 464,547 UK Biobank participantsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparative Validation of ASCVD, Framingham Risk Score, Globorisk, and PREVENT for 10-Year Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in the UK BiobankSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of ten-year cardiovascular disease risk in Bangladesh: A comparative analysis of laboratory and non-laboratory-based WHO risk prediction modelsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Refined selection of individuals for preventive cardiovascular disease treatment with a Transformer-based risk modelSemantic proximity Read ↗

Performance and Calibration of ASCVD, Framingham, and Globorisk Models in a Large UK Biobank Cohort: A 10-Year Longitudinal Outcome AnalysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Prediction performance of a cardiovascular risk assessment tool using Stanford EHR data repositorySemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.