Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of cervical cancer screening models based on Pap and HPV tests in Tbilisi, Georgia.

Central European journal of public health - 1 Sept 2024

Kiguradze Eter, Skhirtladze Tamar, Chkhartishvili Nikoloz, Gogoladze Tamuna, Chikhladze Nino, Alibegashvili Tamar

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of human papillomavirus HPV test with HPV16/18 genotyping and liquid-based cytology (LBC) triage as a primary screening method for cervical cancer compared to conventional Pap test in women undergoing routine cervical cancer screening in Tbilisi. METHODS: Cross-sectional, prospective study was conducted, where 1,000 enrolled women aged 30-60...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Early Detection of Cancer
Share to Georgia (Republic)

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Human papillomavirus 16

Share to Human papillomavirus 18

Share to Papanicolaou Test

Share to Papillomavirus Infections

Share to Sensitivity and Specificity

Share to Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 39352091
DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a8014

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of cervical cancer screening models based on Pap and HPV tests in Tbilisi, Georgia.PMID 39352091Read ↗

The effectiveness of HPV16 and HPV18 genotyping and cytology with different thresholds for the triage of human papillomavirus-based screening on self-collected samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

p16/Ki67 dual stain triage versus cytology in primary human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening with limited genotypingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evidence based appropriate triage strategies for implementing high risk HPV as primary technology in cervical cancer screening.Semantic proximity Read ↗

p16/Ki67 dual stain triage versus cytology in primary human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening with limited genotyping.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of HPV-16 and HPV-18 Genotyping and Cytological Testing as Triage Testing Within Human Papillomavirus-Based Screening in Mexico.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotyping and Cytology Triage of High-Risk HPV DNA Positive Women for Detection of Cervical High-Grade Lesions.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The effectiveness of HPV viral load, reflected by Cobas 4800 HPV-Ct values for the triage of HPV-positive women in primary cervical cancer screening: Direct endocervical samples.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical evaluation of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing with extended HPV genotyping triage for cervical cancer screening: A pooled analysis of individual patient data from nine population-based cervical cancer screening studies from China.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Triage of HPV positive women in cervical cancer screening.Semantic proximity Read ↗

HPV genotyping and p16/Ki-67 test significantly improve detection rate of high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesionSemantic proximity Read ↗

How to triage HPV positive cases: Results of four million females.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The clinical performance of primary HPV screening, primary HPV screening plus cytology cotesting, and cytology alone at a tertiary care hospital.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.