Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the Pluslife Mini Dock RHAM technology with Abbott ID Now and Cepheid GenXpert: A retrospective evaluation study

17 Jun 2024

Abstract excerpt

Abstract Rapid and sensitive detection of pathogens is critical in interrupting the transmission chain of infectious diseases. Currently, real-time (RT-)PCR represents the gold standard for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. RNase HII-assisted amplification (RHAM) is a promising technology, enabling reliable point-of-care (PoC) testing; however, its diagnostic accuracy has not yet been investigated. The present study...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Biosensors and Analytical Detection
Share to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Share to SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 38886535
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64406-9

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the Pluslife Mini Dock RHAM technology with Abbott ID Now and Cepheid GenXpert: A retrospective evaluation studyPMID 38886535Read ↗

Comparison of different sequencing techniques for identification of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern with multiplex real-time PCRSemantic proximity Read ↗

Test Agreement Between Roche Cobas 6800 and Cepheid GeneXpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Assays at High Cycle Threshold RangesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of the automated cartridge-based ARIES SARS-CoV-2 Assay (RUO) against automated Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 PCR as gold standardSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of two commercial platforms and a laboratory developed test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNASemantic proximity Read ↗

Acceptable Performance of the Abbott ID NOW Among Symptomatic Individuals with Confirmed COVID-19Semantic proximity Read ↗

Analytical Sensitivity of Six SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Tests for Omicron versus Delta VariantSemantic proximity Read ↗

Multicenter comparison of the Cobas 6800 system with the RealStar RT-PCR kit for the detection of SARS-CoV-2Semantic proximity Read ↗

Decreased Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Test Is Associated with a Lower Viral Load of Omicron than Delta SARS-CoV-2 VariantSemantic proximity Read ↗

Validation of a novel molecular assay to the diagnostic of COVID-19 based on real time PCR with high resolution meltingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Inclusion of cycle threshold (CT) values when reporting SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results improves clinical Interpretation in suspected and confirmed COVID-19Semantic proximity Read ↗

Application of newly developed SARS-CoV2 serology test along with real-time PCR for early detection in health care workers and on-time plasma donationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of external quality assessment samples revealed crucial performance differences between commercial RT-PCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection when taking extraction methods and real-time-PCR instruments into accountSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.