Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

The dynamicity of mutant KRAS β2 strand modulates its downstream activation and predicts anticancer KRAS inhibition.

Life sciences - 1 Dec 2022

Pashapour Anousheh Jeiran, Barzegar Abolfazl, Hejazi Mohammad Saeid, Mehdizadeh Aghdam Elnaz

Abstract excerpt

AIM: Oncogenic mutations involving KRAS are human cancer's most common driving force. We aimed to determine specific conformational features of the active KRAS regarding downstream signaling activation, especially in mutant forms of KRAS. MAIN METHODS: We applied Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations in triplicate and post-MD analytical methods on the KRAS and its G12 mutant structures. In addition, clustering,...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Share to Mutation

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Neoplasms

Share to Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Share to Signal Transduction

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 36228769
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2022.121053

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The dynamicity of mutant KRAS β2 strand modulates its downstream activation and predicts anticancer KRAS inhibition.PMID 36228769Read ↗

Beyond Structural Bioinformatics for Genomics with Dynamics Characterization of an Expanded KRAS Mutational LandscapeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Decoding KRAS dynamics: Exploring the impact of mutations and inhibitor binding.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of KRAS-Ligand Interaction Modes and Flexibilities Reveals the Binding Characteristics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

In silico comparative analysis of KRAS mutations at codons 12 and 13: Structural modifications of P-Loop, switch I&II regions preventing GTP hydrolysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Mutations influence the conformational dynamics of the GDP/KRAS complex.Semantic proximity Read ↗

In Silico Study of the Acquired Resistance Caused by the Secondary Mutations of KRAS G12C Protein Using Long Time Molecular Dynamics Simulation and Markov State Model Analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pathways and mechanism of MRTX1133 binding to KRAS G12D elucidated by molecular dynamics simulations and Markov state models.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Exploring the GDP binding to KRas WT, G12C, G12D, G12R, and G12V and bound with MRTX1133 using steered molecular dynamics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impacts of Mutations in the P-Loop on Conformational Alterations of KRAS Investigated with Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of mutation probabilities of KRAS G12 missense mutants and their long-timescale dynamics by atomistic molecular simulations and Markov state modeling.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Conformations of KRAS4B Affected by Its Partner Binding and G12C Mutation: Insights from GaMD Trajectory-Image Transformation-Based Deep Learning.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Insight of the molecular mechanism of inhibitors located at different allosteric sites regulating the activity of wild type and mutant KRAS (G12).Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.