Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent.

Journal of evolutionary biology - 1 Nov 2022

Opedal Øystein H, Gross Karin, Chapurlat Elodie, Parachnowitsch Amy, Joffard Nina, Sletvold Nina, Ovaskainen Otso, Friberg Magne

Abstract excerpt

Natural selection on floral scent composition is a key element of the hypothesis that pollinators and other floral visitors drive scent evolution. The measure of such selection is complicated by the high-dimensional nature of floral scent data and uncertainty about the cognitive processes involved in scent-mediated communication. We use dimension reduction through reduced-rank regression to jointly estimate a...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Flowers
Share to Odorants
Share to Phenotype

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Pheromones

Share to Pollination

Share to Volatile Organic Compounds

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 36177776
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.14103
PMCID: PMC9828191

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent.PMID 36177776Read ↗

Understanding intraspecific variation of floral scent in light of evolutionary ecology.Semantic proximity Read ↗

What you smell is more important than what you see? Natural selection on floral scent.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Why Do Floral Perfumes Become Different? Region-Specific Selection on Floral Scent in a Terrestrial Orchid.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Phenotypic selection to increase floral scent emission, but not flower size or colour in bee-pollinated Penstemon digitalis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Heritability of floral volatiles and pleiotropic responses to artificial selection in Brassica rapa.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Covariation and phenotypic integration in chemical communication displays: biosynthetic constraints and eco-evolutionary implications.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Natural selection on floral volatile production in Penstemon digitalis: highlighting the role of linalool.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Chemical communication and its role in sexual selection across Animalia.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Quantifying hummingbird preference for floral trait combinations: The role of selection on trait interactions in the evolution of pollination syndromes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Floral signals evolve in a predictable way under artificial and pollinator selection in Brassica rapa.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic distance and pollinator sharing shape divergence in floral volatiles in closely related dioecious Ficus species.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Quantitative genetic analysis of attractiveness of yeast products to Drosophila.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.