Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Accuracy of genomic prediction of maternal traits in pigs using Bayesian variable selection methods.

Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie - 1 Nov 2022

Kjetså Maria V, Gjuvsland Arne B, Nordbø Øyvind, Grindflek Eli, Meuwissen Theo

Abstract excerpt

The aim of this study was to compare three methods of genomic prediction: GBLUP, BayesC and BayesGC for genomic prediction of six maternal traits in Landrace sows using a panel of 660 K SNPs. The effects of different priors for the Bayesian methods were also investigated. GBLUP does not take the genetic architecture into account as all SNPs are assumed to have equally sized effects and relies heavily on the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Bayes Theorem
Share to Genome

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genomics

Share to Genotype

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Phenotype

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 35758628
DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12729
PMCID: PMC9796620

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Accuracy of genomic prediction of maternal traits in pigs using Bayesian variable selection methods.PMID 35758628Read ↗

Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improving genetic evaluation of litter size and piglet mortality for both genotyped and nongenotyped individuals using a single-step method.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genome-enabled methods for predicting litter size in pigs: a comparison.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Using genomic selection to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for multi-populations in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Investigating pig survival in different production phases using genomic models.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction in French Charolais beef cattle using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction for growth and reproduction traits in pig using an admixed reference population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Predictive ability of multi-population genomic prediction methods of phenotypes for reproduction traits in Chinese and Austrian pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Multi-trait genomic prediction in pigs using single and multistep methods based on the absorption of ungenotyped animals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Using pre-selected variants from large-scale whole-genome sequence data for single-step genomic predictions in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Haplotype genomic prediction of phenotypic values based on chromosome distance and gene boundaries using low-coverage sequencing in Duroc pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.