Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Effect of genotyping strategies on the sustained benefit of single-step genomic BLUP over multiple generations.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE - 18 Mar 2022

Sánchez-Mayor Milagros, Riggio Valentina, Navarro Pau, Gutiérrez-Gil Beatriz, Haley Chris S, De la Fuente Luis Fernando, Arranz Juan-José, Pong-Wong Ricardo

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) allows the inclusion of information from genotyped and ungenotyped individuals in a single analysis. This avoids the need to genotype all candidates with the potential benefit of reducing overall costs. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of genotyping strategies, the proportion of genotyped candidates and the genotyping...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Genome
Share to Genomics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genotype

Share to Phenotype

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 35303797
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-022-00712-y
PMCID: PMC8931970

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Effect of genotyping strategies on the sustained benefit of single-step genomic BLUP over multiple generations.PMID 35303797Read ↗

The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-Step Genomic Evaluations from Theory to Practice: Using SNP Chips and Sequence Data in BLUPF90.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Hot topic: Use of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) with a large number of genotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The prediction accuracies of linear-type traits in Czech Holstein cattle when using ssGBLUP or wssGBLUP.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: The role of genotypes from animals without phenotypes in single-step genomic evaluations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Experiences with a single-step genome evaluation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Factors affecting GEBV accuracy with single-step Bayesian models.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Investigating the impact of preselection on subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluation of preselected animals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Considering dominance in reduced single-step genomic evaluations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.