Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of eleven in vitro diagnostic assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA

1 Jun 2021

Abstract excerpt

Transmission mitigation of SARS-CoV-2 requires the availability of accurate and sensitive detection methods. There are several commercial ad hoc molecular diagnostic kits currently on the market, many of which have been evaluated by different groups. However, in low resource settings the availability and cost of these commercial kits can be a limiting factor for many diagnostic laboratories. In such cases...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Share to SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Share to Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 34087339
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114200

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 4 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of eleven in vitro diagnostic assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNAPMID 34087339Read ↗

Comparison and Sensitivity Evaluation of Three Different Commercial Real-Time Quantitative PCR Kits for SARS-CoV-2 DetectionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of three molecular diagnostic assays for SARS‐CoV‐2 detection: Evaluation of analytical sensitivity and clinical performanceSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of WHO listed COVID-19 qPCR primers and probe in silico with 375 SERS-CoV-2 full genome sequencesSemantic proximity Read ↗

A Method to evaluate analytical sensitivity of qRT-PCR kits for SARS-CoV-2 detectionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of 12 Quantitative RT-PCR Commercial Kits for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2Semantic proximity Read ↗

True or false: what are the factors that influence COVID-19 diagnosis by RT-qPCR?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of Different PCR Assay Formats for Sensitive and Specific Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNASemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of three TaqMan Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR assays in detecting SARS-CoV-2Semantic proximity Read ↗

Resource-efficient internally controlled in-house real-time PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2Semantic proximity Read ↗

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Samples: Target-specific Analysis of Qualitative Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction(RT-PCR) Diagnostic KitsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Authors’ response: SARS-CoV-2 detection by real-time RT-PCRSemantic proximity Read ↗

Highly sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by multiplex rRT-PCR for molecular diagnosis of COVID-19 by clinical laboratoriesSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.