Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparative Analysis of Fecal Microbiomes From Wild Waterbirds to Poultry, Cattle, Pigs, and Wastewater Treatment Plants for a Microbial Source Tracking Approach

14 Jul 2021

Abstract excerpt

Fecal pollution in coastal areas is of a high concern since it affects bathing and shellfish harvesting activities. Wild waterbirds are non-negligible in the overall signal of the detectable pollution. Yet, studies on wild waterbirds’ gut microbiota focus on migratory trajectories and feeding impact on their shape, rare studies address their comparison to other sources and develop quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Fecal contamination and water quality
Share to Gut microbiota and health
Share to Mycobacterium research and diagnosis

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 34335529
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.697553

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparative Analysis of Fecal Microbiomes From Wild Waterbirds to Poultry, Cattle, Pigs, and Wastewater Treatment Plants for a Microbial Source Tracking ApproachPMID 34335529Read ↗

Comparison of the Performance of Different Microbial Source Tracking Markers among European and North African RegionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Microbial community analysis and identification of alternative host-specific fecal indicators in fecal and river water samples using pyrosequencing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Metagenome-based comparisons of decay rates and host-specificity of fecal microbial communities for improved microbial source trackingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Advancing source tracking: systematic review and source-specific genome database curation of fecally shed prokaryotesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of human and animal fecal microbiota for microbial source trackingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Pathogenic taxa constitute a substantial portion of bat and wild bird fecal bacterial microbiotaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Uneven genotypic diversity of Escherichia coli in fecal sources limits the performance of a library-dependent method of microbial source tracking on the southwestern French Atlantic coast.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of Sewage and Animal Fecal Microbiomes by Using Oligotyping Reveals Potential Human Fecal Indicators in Multiple Taxonomic GroupsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Microbial source tracking using metagenomics and other new technologiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of molecular community analysis methods for discerning fecal sources and human wasteSemantic proximity Read ↗

Metagenomic analysis reveals the composition and function of intestinal microbiota were affected by different sampling methods and digestive tract segments in monogastric and polygastric animalsSemantic proximity Read ↗

QT-AMP: Quanti-Tray-based amplicon sequencing for simultaneous quantification and identification of enterococci for microbial source trackingSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.