Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Phytochrome-interacting factors interact with transcription factor CONSTANS to suppress flowering in rose.

Plant physiology - 11 Jun 2021

Sun Jingjing, Lu Jun, Bai Mengjuan, Chen Yeqing, Wang Weinan, Fan Chunguo, Liu Jinyi, Ning Guogui, Wang Changquan

Abstract excerpt

As day-neutral (DN) woody perennial plants, the flowering time of roses (Rosa spp.) is assumed to be independent of the photoperiodic conditions; however, light responses of rose plants are not well understood. Chinese rose (Rosa chinensis) plants were grown under two light intensities (low light [LL], 92 μmol·m-2·s-1; or high light [HL], 278 μmol·m-2·s-1), and either with or without an end-of-day far-red...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Arabidopsis
Share to Flowers
Share to Hypocotyl

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Photoperiod

Share to Phytochrome

Share to Plant Proteins

Share to Transgenes

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 33693800
DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiab109
PMCID: PMC8195524

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Phytochrome-interacting factors interact with transcription factor CONSTANS to suppress flowering in rose.PMID 33693800Read ↗

Arabidopsis clock-associated pseudo-response regulators PRR9, PRR7 and PRR5 coordinately and positively regulate flowering time through the canonical CONSTANS-dependent photoperiodic pathway.Semantic proximity Read ↗

RoKSN, a floral repressor, forms protein complexes with RoFD and RoFT to regulate vegetative and reproductive development in rose.Semantic proximity Read ↗

RFI2, a RING-domain zinc finger protein, negatively regulates CONSTANS expression and photoperiodic flowering.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Terminal flower2, an Arabidopsis homolog of heterochromatin protein1, counteracts the activation of flowering locus T by constans in the vascular tissues of leaves to regulate flowering time.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetics and genomics of flower initiation and development in roses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of flowering-related genes reveal putative floral induction and differentiation mechanisms in tea plant (Camellia sinensis).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Identification and characterization of the CONSTANS-like gene family in the short-day plant Chrysanthemum lavandulifolium.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype of FLOWERING LOCUS T homologue contributes to flowering time differences in wild and cultivated roses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

SRR1 is essential to repress flowering in non-inductive conditions in Arabidopsis thaliana.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Quantitative trait loci for flowering time and inflorescence architecture in rose.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Recent advances of flowering locus T gene in higher plants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

FKF1 conveys timing information for CONSTANS stabilization in photoperiodic flowering.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.