Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Analytical performance evaluation of five RT‐PCR kits for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

27 Oct 2020

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of five commercial RT-PCR kits (Genekey, Daan, BioGerm, Liferiver, and Yaneng) commonly used in China, since such comparison data are lacking. METHODS: A total of 20 COVID-19 confirmed patients and 30 negative nasopharyngeal swab specimens were analyzed by five kits. The detection ability of five RT-PCR kits was evaluated with 5 concentration gradients...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Share to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Share to SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 33107116
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.23643

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 24 Oct 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Analytical performance evaluation of five RT‐PCR kits for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2PMID 33107116Read ↗

An acceptable methodological evaluation method of real-time fluorescent RT-PCR targeting SARS-CoV-2Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of commercial realtime reverse transcription PCR assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Method to evaluate analytical sensitivity of qRT-PCR kits for SARS-CoV-2 detectionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison and Sensitivity Evaluation of Three Different Commercial Real-Time Quantitative PCR Kits for SARS-CoV-2 DetectionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of 12 Quantitative RT-PCR Commercial Kits for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of three TaqMan Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR assays in detecting SARS-CoV-2Semantic proximity Read ↗

An acceptable method to evaluate the analytical performance of real-time fluorescent RT-PCR targeting SARS-CoV-2Semantic proximity Read ↗

Investigation of Compatibility of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Kits Containing Different Gene Targets During COVID-19 PandemicSemantic proximity Read ↗

True or false: what are the factors that influence COVID-19 diagnosis by RT-qPCR?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparative Analysis of Four Commercial RT-PCR Diagnostic Assay for Detection of Covid-19Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of a new point-of-care quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain test for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development of a universal real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of pan-SARS-coronaviruses with an RNA-based internal controlSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.