Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

The difference between karyotype analysis and chromosome microarray for mosaicism of aneuploid chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis

30 Aug 2020

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVE: To compare karyotype and chromosomal microarray (CMA) analysis of aneuploid chromosome mosaicism in amniocentesis samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2091 amniocentesis samples from pregnant women were collected from March 1, 2019, to January 31, 2020. Karyotype analysis was performed using G-banding and CMA analysis used the Affymetrix CytoScan 750K SNP microarray. RESULT: Thirteen cases with...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Share to Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 32864771
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.23514

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The difference between karyotype analysis and chromosome microarray for mosaicism of aneuploid chromosomes in prenatal diagnosisPMID 32864771Read ↗

Comparison of chromosomal microarray and karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis using 491 amniotic fluid samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of Combined Karyotype Analysis and Chromosome Microarray Analysis in Prenatal Diagnosis: A Cohort Study of 3710 PregnanciesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical application of chromosome microarray analysis and karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis in Northwest ChinaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Integrated CNV-seq, karyotyping and SNP-array analyses for effective prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicism.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Fetal mosaicism, should conventional karyotype always be performed?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Chromosome microarray analysis combined with karyotype analysis is a powerful tool for the detection in pregnant women with high-risk indicatorsSemantic proximity Read ↗

How Are SNP-Array, Karyotyping, and FISH Applied in Prenatal Practice? A Focus on Diagnosis of Mosaicism Involving the Sex Chromosomes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The inconsistency between two major aneuploidy-screening platforms-single-nucleotide polymorphism array and next-generation sequencing-in the detection of embryo mosaicism.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Chromosomal mosaicism detected by karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Prenatal diagnosis and pregnancy outcomes of mosaicism detected by CMA-seq.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical application of chromosomal karyotype analysis combined with chromosomal microarray analysis in the prenatal diagnosis of pregnant women with advanced maternal ageSemantic proximity Read ↗

Application of Chromosomal Karyotype Analysis Combined With Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in the Amniotic Fluid of Advanced Maternal AgeSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.