Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Cell-free DNA screening in twin pregnancies: A more accurate and reliable screening tool.

Prenatal diagnosis - 1 Sept 2020

Chibuk Jason, Rafalko Jill, Boomer Theresa, McCullough Ron, McLennan Graham, Wyatt Philip, Almasri Eyad

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVE: Outcome data from cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening in twin gestations are limited. This study adds an appreciable number of confirmed outcomes to the literature, and assesses performance of cfDNA screening in twins over a 4.5-year period at one large clinical laboratory. METHOD: Prenatal cytogenetic and SNP microarray results were cross-referenced with cfDNA results for twin pregnancies, yielding 422...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Cell-Free Nucleic Acids
Share to Cohort Studies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Microarray Analysis

Share to Pregnancy

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Share to Sensitivity and Specificity

Share to United States

Share to Young Adult

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 32677048
DOI: 10.1002/pd.5797
PMCID: PMC7540584

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Cell-free DNA screening in twin pregnancies: A more accurate and reliable screening tool.PMID 32677048Read ↗

Screening for trisomies by cfDNA testing of maternal blood in twin pregnancy: update of The Fetal Medicine Foundation results and meta‐analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cell‐free <scp>DNA</scp> testing of maternal blood in screening for trisomies in twin pregnancy: updated cohort study at 10–14 weeks and meta‐analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cell‐free fetal DNA analysis in maternal plasma as screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in twin pregnancySemantic proximity Read ↗

Cell-Free DNA Analysis for Trisomy Risk Assessment in First-Trimester Twin PregnanciesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Noninvasive prenatal screening in twin pregnancies with cell-free DNA using the IONA test: a prospective multicenter studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Routine first‐trimester screening for fetal trisomies in twin pregnancy: cell‐free DNA test contingent on results from combined testSemantic proximity Read ↗

Prospective first‐trimester screening for trisomies by cell‐free DNA testing of maternal blood in twin pregnancySemantic proximity Read ↗

Performance of screening for aneuploidies by cell‐free <scp>DNA</scp> analysis of maternal blood in twin pregnanciesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Aneuploidy screening by non‐invasive prenatal testing in twin pregnancySemantic proximity Read ↗

Performance of Cell-Free DNA Sequencing-Based Non-invasive Prenatal Testing: Our Experience on 36456 both Singleton and Multiple Pregnancies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Should vanishing twin pregnancies be systematically excluded from cell‐free fetal DNA testing?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Performance of noninvasive prenatal screening in twin pregnancies: a retrospective study of 5469 twin pregnanciesSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.