Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options

1 Jan 2020

Abstract excerpt

Objective: Decision-making and patient experiences with embryo selection during in vitro fertilization often include genetic testing options. The purpose of this study was to gain insight about the experiences and perspectives of women using in vitro fertilization and genetic technologies. Methods: Interviews ( n = 37) were conducted among female patients who had undergone in vitro fertilization, underwent...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 32518912
DOI: 10.1177/2633494119899942

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing optionsPMID 32518912Read ↗

Beyond the biopsy: predictors of decision regret and anxiety following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidySemantic proximity Read ↗

The Decision-Making Process regarding Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation in Girls with Turner Syndrome by Patients, Parents, and Healthcare Providers: A Mixed-Methods StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

Review of patient decision‐making factors and attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Addressing ethical issues related to prenatal diagnostic proceduresSemantic proximity Read ↗

Divergence Between Clinician and Patient Perspectives on Polygenic Embryo Screening: A Qualitative StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

The journey from infertility to uterus transplantation: A mixed-methods study of the perspectives of participants in the Dallas Uterus Transplant Study (DUETS)Semantic proximity Read ↗

To test or not to test? A framework for counselling patients on preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)Semantic proximity Read ↗

The decision-making process regarding ovarian tissue cryopreservation in girls with Turner syndrome by patients, parents, and healthcare providers: a mixed-methods studySemantic proximity Read ↗

In vitro fertilization and adverse childhood outcomes: what we know, where we are going, and how we will get there. A glimpse into what lies behind and beckons aheadSemantic proximity Read ↗

Ethical and moral perspectives of individuals who considered/used preimplantation (embryo) genetic testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Conflict between values and technology: perceptions of preimplantation genetic diagnosis among women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Parental motivations for and adaptation to trio‐exome sequencing in a prospective prenatal testing cohort: Beyond the diagnosisSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.