Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Donor IUI is equally effective for heterosexual couples, single women and lesbians, but autologous IUI does worse

30 Jul 2019

Abstract excerpt

STUDY QUESTION: Are there differences in the clinical outcomes of IUI among different populational groups (heterosexual couples, single women and lesbian couples)? SUMMARY ANSWER: The outcome of donor IUI (D-IUI) is similar in all populational groups and better than that seen with autologous insemination. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A vast body of literature on clinical outcome is available for counselling...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Share to Ovarian function and disorders
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 31711203
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez179

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Donor IUI is equally effective for heterosexual couples, single women and lesbians, but autologous IUI does worsePMID 31711203Read ↗

Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2013: results generated from European registers by ESHRE†Semantic proximity Read ↗

ICSI does not improve reproductive outcomes in autologous ovarian response cycles with non-male factor subfertilitySemantic proximity Read ↗

Secondary sex ratio in assisted reproduction: an analysis of 1 376 454 treatment cycles performed in the UKSemantic proximity Read ↗

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro insemination in couples with non-male infertility factor in the ‘real-world’ setting: analysis of the HFEA registrySemantic proximity Read ↗

Single-embryo transfer: a key strategy to reduce the risk for multiple pregnancy in assisted human reproductionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative delivery rates in different age groups after artificial insemination with donor spermSemantic proximity Read ↗

Recommendations for reducing the risk of viral transmission during fertility treatment with the use of autologous gametes: a committee opinionSemantic proximity Read ↗

What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: Defining outcome in ART: a Gordian knot of safety, efficacy and qualitySemantic proximity Read ↗

The sex ratio of singleton and twin delivery offspring in assisted reproductive technology in ChinaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Equivalency of in vitro fertilization success rates in elective single blastocyst transfer and elective double blastocyst transfer: An example of equivalence methodology in clinical reproductive healthSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including ∼15,000 womenSemantic proximity Read ↗

Sharing motherhood: biological lesbian co-mothers, a new IVF indicationSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.