Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Discrepancy in Frailty Identification: Move Beyond Predictive Validity.

The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences - 20 Jan 2020

Xue Qian-Li, Tian Jing, Walston Jeremy D, Chaves Paulo H M, Newman Anne B, Bandeen-Roche Karen

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the discordance in frailty classification between the frailty index (FI) and the physical frailty phenotype (PFP) and identify factors discriminating those with discordant frailty classification from each other and from those for whom the assessments agree. METHODS: A prospective observational study of older adults aged 65 and older selected from Medicare eligibility lists in four U.S....

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Aged
Share to Frail Elderly

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Frailty

Share to Geriatric Assessment

Share to Phenotype

Share to Prevalence

Share to United States

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 30789645
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glz052
PMCID: PMC7176056

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Discrepancy in Frailty Identification: Move Beyond Predictive Validity.PMID 30789645Read ↗

Frailty prevalence and associated factors in the Mexican health and aging study: A comparison of the frailty index and the phenotype.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison of two approaches to measuring frailty in elderly people.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracies of Frailty Assessment Tools for Frailty in Older PeopleSemantic proximity Read ↗

Systematic review of the utility of the frailty index and frailty phenotype to predict all-cause mortality in older people.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Frailty: a tale of two concepts.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Frailty in NHANES: Comparing the frailty index and phenotype.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Substitution of self-reported measures for objectively assessed grip strength and slow walk in the Physical Frailty Phenotype: ramifications for validity.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Screening for intrinsic capacity and frailty in the primary care population with multimorbidity using the Integrated Care for Older People Screening Tool and two different frailty measures – the Frailty Phenotype and Clinical Frailty Scale: a cross-sectional studySemantic proximity Read ↗

How common is frailty in older Australians?Semantic proximity Read ↗

The frailty phenotype and the frailty index: different instruments for different purposes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development, Construct Validity, and Predictive Validity of a Continuous Frailty Scale: Results From 2 Large US Cohorts.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.