Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Single embryo transfer by Day 3 time-lapse selection versus Day 5 conventional morphological selection: a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial

15 Feb 2018

Abstract excerpt

STUDY QUESTION: Does single cleavage-stage (Day 3) embryo transfer using a time-lapse (TL) hierarchical classification model achieve comparable ongoing pregnancy rates (OPR) to single blastocyst (Day 5) transfer by conventional morphological (CM) selection? SUMMARY ANSWER: Day 3 single embryo transfer (SET) with a hierarchical classification model had a significantly lower OPR compared with Day 5 SET with CM...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Share to Ovarian function and disorders
Share to Reproductive Biology and Fertility

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 29546361
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey047

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Single embryo transfer by Day 3 time-lapse selection versus Day 5 conventional morphological selection: a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trialPMID 29546361Read ↗

Effect of single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryo transfer on cumulative live births in women with good prognosis undergoing in vitro fertilization: Multicenter Randomized Controlled TrialSemantic proximity Read ↗

Robust and generalizable embryo selection based on artificial intelligence and time-lapse image sequencesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3Semantic proximity Read ↗

Does Conventional Morphological Evaluation Still Play a Role in Predicting Blastocyst Formation?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Embryo selection using time-lapse analysis (Early Embryo Viability Assessment) in conjunction with standard morphology: a prospective two-center pilot studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Time-lapse parameters as predictors of blastocyst development and pregnancy outcome in embryos from good prognosis patients: a prospective cohort studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical validation of an automatic classification algorithm applied on cleavage stage embryos: analysis for blastulation, euploidy, implantation, and live-birth potentialSemantic proximity Read ↗

Limitations of a time-lapse blastocyst prediction model: a large multicentre outcome analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of embryo morphokinetics, multinucleation and cleavage anomalies using continuous time-lapse monitoring in blastocyst transfer cyclesSemantic proximity Read ↗

The higher the score, the better the clinical outcome: retrospective evaluation of automatic embryo grading as a support tool for embryo selection in IVF laboratoriesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Non-inferiority of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in poor prognosis IVF patients (PRECiSE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trialSemantic proximity Read ↗

A stepwise approach to move from a cleavage-stage to a blastocyst-stage transfer policy for all patients in the IVF clinicSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.