Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Decision-making, attitudes, and understanding among patients and relatives invited to undergo genome sequencing in the 100,000 Genomes Project: A multisite survey study

30 Nov 2021

Abstract excerpt

Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess decisions, attitudes, and understanding of participants (patients, parents, relatives) having genome sequencing for rare disease diagnosis. Methods This study involved a cross-sectional observational survey with participants in the 100,000 Genomes Project. Results Survey response rate was 51% (504/978). Most participants self-reported that they had decided to...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Share to Ethics in Clinical Research
Share to Genomics and Rare Diseases

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 34906473
DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.08.010

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Decision-making, attitudes, and understanding among patients and relatives invited to undergo genome sequencing in the 100,000 Genomes Project: A multisite survey studyPMID 34906473Read ↗

Parents’ motivations, concerns and understanding of genome sequencing: a qualitative interview studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of willingness to pay for expanded carrier screening among women and couples undergoing preconception carrier screeningSemantic proximity Read ↗

Delivering genome sequencing in clinical practice: an interview study with healthcare professionals involved in the 100 000 Genomes ProjectSemantic proximity Read ↗

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Should pretest genetic counselling be required for patients pursuing genomic sequencing? Results from a survey of participants in a large genomic implementation studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Perspectives of clinical genetics professionals toward genome sequencing and incidental findings: a survey studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Experiences with obtaining informed consent for genomic sequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

The NextGen Study: patient motivation for participation in genome sequencing for carrier statusSemantic proximity Read ↗

Identifying Aspects of Public Attitudes Toward Whole Genome Sequencing to Inform the Integration of Genomics into CareSemantic proximity Read ↗

Exploring broad consent in the context of the 100,000 Genomes Project: a mixed methods studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Consanguineous couples’ experiences and views regarding expanded carrier screening: Barriers and facilitators in the decision-making processSemantic proximity Read ↗

Predispositional genome sequencing in healthy adults: design, participant characteristics, and early outcomes of the PeopleSeq Consortium.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.