Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Efficiency of genomic prediction of non-assessed single crosses.

Heredity - 1 Apr 2018

Viana José Marcelo Soriano, Pereira Helcio Duarte, Mundim Gabriel Borges, Piepho Hans-Peter, E Silva Fabyano Fonseca

Abstract excerpt

An important application of genomic selection in plant breeding is predicting untested single crosses (SCs). Most investigations on the prediction efficiency were based on tested SCs using cross-validation. The main objective was to assess the prediction efficiency by correlating the predicted and true genotypic values of untested SCs (accuracy) and measuring the efficacy of identification of the best 300...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Computer Simulation
Share to Crosses, Genetic
Share to Genetic Linkage

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genomics

Share to Models, Statistical

Share to Plant Breeding

Share to Quantitative Trait, Heritable

Share to Quantitative Trait Loci

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 29180718
DOI: 10.1038/s41437-017-0027-0
PMCID: PMC5842238

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Efficiency of genomic prediction of non-assessed single crosses.PMID 29180718Read ↗

Why usefulness is rarely useful.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Overview of Genomic Prediction Methods and the Associated Assumptions on the Variance of Marker Effect, and on the Architecture of the Target Trait.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Validation of cross-progeny variance genomic prediction using simulations and experimental data in winter elite bread wheat.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Revisiting hybrid breeding designs using genomic predictions: simulations highlight the superiority of incomplete factorials between segregating families over topcross designs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accounting for Correlation Between Traits in Genomic Prediction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic Prediction of Testcross Performance in Canola (Brassica napus).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of genomic-enabled cross selection criteria for the improvement of inbred line breeding populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction in family bulks using different traits and cross-validations in pine.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic mating in outbred species: predicting cross usefulness with additive and total genetic covariance matrices.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Multiple-trait breeding values for parental selection in self-pollinating crops.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Multi-Trait Genomic Prediction Improves Accuracy of Selection among Doubled Haploid Lines in Maize.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Expected values for the accuracy of predicted breeding values accounting for genetic differences between reference and target populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.