Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

The effect of various factors on the dental arch relationship in non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate children assessed by new approach: a retrospective study.

BMC pediatrics - 6 May 2017

Haque Sanjida, Alam Mohammad Khursheed, Khamis Mohd Fadhli

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and palate (CLP) is one of the most common birth defects. Multiple factors are believed to be responsible for an unfavorable dental arch relationship in CLP. Facial growth (maxillary) retardation, which results in class III malocclusion, is the primary challenge that CLP patients face. Phenotype factors and postnatal treatment factors influence treatment outcomes in unilateral cleft lip and...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Bangladesh
Share to Child, Preschool

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Cleft Lip

Share to Cleft Palate

Share to Logistic Models

Share to Observer Variation

Share to Single-Blind Method

Share to Treatment Outcome

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 28477625
DOI: 10.1186/s12887-017-0870-4
PMCID: PMC5420398

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The effect of various factors on the dental arch relationship in non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate children assessed by new approach: a retrospective study.PMID 28477625Read ↗

Treatment Outcome of Bangladeshi UCLP Patients Based on Both Phenotype and Postnatal Treatment Factors using Modified Huddart Bodenham (mHB) Index.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Two Palatal Repair Methods Using the Modified Huddart Scoring System, EUROCRAN Yardstick, and the 5-Year-Old IndicesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparative analysis for variation of skeletal and dental parameters in bilateral cleft palate in central India population – A Nemoceph studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of asymmetries in early childhood: Is there a consensus?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prevalence of tooth agenesis and supernumerary teeth related to different Thai cleft lip and cleft palate populationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of impact of three different methods of surgical palatal repair on maxillary growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate patientsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Association of distinct craniofacial features in nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate family members.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Craniofacial morphology in parents of cleft children and healthy individuals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Study of the cephalometric features of parents of children with cleft lip and/or palate anomaly.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Early craniofacial morphology and growth in children with bilateral complete cleft lip and palate.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Subphenotyping and Classification of Cleft Lip and Alveolus in Adult Unoperated Patients: A New Embryological Approach.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Posteroanterior cephalometric analysis of the parental craniofacial morphology in orofacial clefting.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.