Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Mixed population genomics support for the central marginal hypothesis across the invasive range of the cane toad (Rhinella marina) in Australia.

Molecular ecology - 1 Sept 2016

Trumbo Daryl R, Epstein Brendan, Hohenlohe Paul A, Alford Ross A, Schwarzkopf Lin, Storfer Andrew

Abstract excerpt

Understanding factors that cause species' geographic range limits is a major focus in ecology and evolution. The central marginal hypothesis (CMH) predicts that species cannot adapt to conditions beyond current geographic range edges because genetic diversity decreases from core to edge due to smaller, more isolated edge populations. We employed a population genomics framework using 24 235-33 112 SNP loci to test...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Australia
Share to Bayes Theorem

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Climate

Share to Ecosystem

Share to Genetics, Population

Share to Introduced Species

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 27393238
DOI: 10.1111/mec.13754
PMCID: PMC5021610

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Mixed population genomics support for the central marginal hypothesis across the invasive range of the cane toad (Rhinella marina) in Australia.PMID 27393238Read ↗

A test of the central-marginal hypothesis using population genetics and ecological niche modelling in an endemic salamander (Ambystoma barbouri).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Complex range expansion and selective regime in the introduced Florida cane toad.Semantic proximity Read ↗

How is adaptive potential distributed within species ranges?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Spatial variation in genomic signatures of local adaptation during the cane toad invasion of Australia.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluating the Central-Marginal Hypothesis: Introgression and Genetic Variation at the Trailing Edge of Quercus bicolor.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic variability and the ecology of geographic range: A test of the central-marginal hypothesis in Australian scincid lizards.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The genetic consequences of population marginality: a case study in maritime pineSemantic proximity Read ↗

Unique genetic variation at a species' rear edge is under threat from global climate change.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Incorporating latitudinal and central-marginal trends in assessing genetic variation across species ranges.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Geographic variation in genetic and demographic performance: new insights from an old biogeographical paradigm.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Partial support for the central-marginal hypothesis within a population: reduced genetic diversity but not increased differentiation at the range edge of an island endemic bird.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Is the central-marginal hypothesis a general rule? Evidence from three distributions of an expanding mangrove species, Avicennia germinans (L.) L.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.