Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Intent to treat analysis of <i>in vitro</i> fertilization and preimplantation genetic screening versus expectant management in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss

7 Jun 2016

Abstract excerpt

STUDY QUESTION: In an intent to treat analysis, are clinical outcomes improved in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) patients undergoing IVF and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) compared with patients who are expectantly managed (EM)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Among all attempts at PGS or EM among RPL patients, clinical outcomes including pregnancy rate, live birth (LB) rate and clinical miscarriage (CM) rate were...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies
Share to Reproductive System and Pregnancy

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 27278003
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew135

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Intent to treat analysis of <i>in vitro</i> fertilization and preimplantation genetic screening versus expectant management in patients with recurrent pregnancy lossPMID 27278003Read ↗

Pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization frozen embryo transfer (IVF-FET) with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL): a SART-CORS studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss due to embryonic aneuploidy or recurrent implantation failureSemantic proximity Read ↗

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy could not improve cumulative live birth rate among 1,003 couples with recurrent pregnancy lossSemantic proximity Read ↗

Effects of NGS-based PGT-a for idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss and implantation failure: a retrospective cohort studySemantic proximity Read ↗

The number of prior pregnancy losses does not impact euploidy rates in young patients with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation combined with 24-chromosome microarray of miscarriage tissue provides a probable or definite cause of pregnancy loss in over 90% of patientsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Improves Cumulative Live Birth Rate and Reduces Miscarriage in Recurrent Pregnancy LossSemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical outcomes of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in high-risk patients: a retrospective cohort studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Recurrent pregnancy loss: evaluation and treatment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Noninvasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Implantation Failure: Breakthrough or Overpromise?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy helps to achieve a live birth with fewer transfer cycles for the blastocyst FET patients with unexplained recurrent implantation failureSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.