Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of cytology, HPV DNA testing and HPV 16/18 genotyping alone or combined targeting to the more balanced methodology for cervical cancer screening.

Gynecologic oncology - 1 Jul 2016

Chatzistamatiou Kimon, Moysiadis Theodoros, Moschaki Viktoria, Panteleris Nikolaos, Agorastos Theodoros

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study was to identify the most effective cervical cancer screening algorithm incorporating different combinations of cytology, HPV testing and genotyping. METHODS: Women 25-55years old recruited for the "HERMES" (HEllenic Real life Multicentric cErvical Screening) study were screened in terms of cytology and high-risk (hr) HPV testing with HPV 16/18 genotyping. Women...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Algorithms
Share to Datasets as Topic

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to DNA, Viral

Share to Human papillomavirus 16

Share to Human papillomavirus 18

Share to Papillomavirus Infections

Share to Uterine Cervical Dysplasia

Share to Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 27126005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.04.027

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of cytology, HPV DNA testing and HPV 16/18 genotyping alone or combined targeting to the more balanced methodology for cervical cancer screening.PMID 27126005Read ↗

Diagnostic accuracy of high-risk HPV DNA genotyping for primary cervical cancer screening and triage of HPV-positive women, compared to cytology: preliminary results of the PIPAVIR study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of partial genotyping with HPV16/18 for triage of HPV positive, cytology negative women in the COMPACT study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

p16/Ki67 dual stain triage versus cytology in primary human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening with limited genotypingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evidence based appropriate triage strategies for implementing high risk HPV as primary technology in cervical cancer screening.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of cervical cancer screening strategies incorporating different combinations of cytology, HPV testing, and genotyping for HPV 16/18: results from the ATHENA HPV study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical evaluation of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing with extended HPV genotyping triage for cervical cancer screening: A pooled analysis of individual patient data from nine population-based cervical cancer screening studies from China.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The clinical performance of primary HPV screening, primary HPV screening plus cytology cotesting, and cytology alone at a tertiary care hospital.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Is HPV DNA testing specificity comparable to that of cytological testing in primary cervical cancer screening? Results of a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trialsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Triage options for positive high-risk HPV results from HPV-based cervical cancer screening: a review of the potential alternatives to Papanicolaou test cytology.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The clinical value of HPV genotyping in triage of women with high-risk-HPV-positive self-samples.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparative pilot study about HPV test with partial genotyping in primary screening versus other strategies for cervical cancer population screening, CRYGEN 16/18 study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Risk-Stratified versus Cytology-Based Triage of Non-HPV 16/18-Positive for Detection of High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Protocol of a Non- Inferiority Randomized Controlled TrialSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.