Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Biases of tree-independent-character-subsampling methods.

Molecular phylogenetics and evolution - 1 Jul 2016

Simmons Mark P, Gatesy John

Abstract excerpt

Observed Variability (OV) and Tree Independent Generation of Evolutionary Rates (TIGER) are quick and easy-to-apply tree-independent methods that have been proposed to provide unbiased estimates of each character's rate of evolution and serve as the basis for excluding rapidly evolving characters. Both methods have been applied to multiple phylogenomic datasets, and in many cases the authors considered their...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Data Interpretation, Statistical
Share to Evolution, Molecular
Share to Genetic Variation

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Classification

Share to Data Accuracy

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Molecular Typing

Share to Phylogeny

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 27103257
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.04.022

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Biases of tree-independent-character-subsampling methods.PMID 27103257Read ↗

Confounding asymmetries in evolutionary diversification and character change.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evolutionary Sample Size and Consilience in Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Phylogenetic analysis and intraspecific variation: performance of parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Calculating independent contrasts for the comparative study of substitution rates.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improving the Robustness of Phylogenetic Independent Contrasts: Addressing Abrupt Evolutionary Shifts with Outlier-and Distribution-Guided CorrelationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Relative character-state space, amount of potential phylogenetic information, and heterogeneity of nucleotide and amino acid characters.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimating divergence times in the presence of an overdispersed molecular clock.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Nonrandom variation in within-species sample size and missing data in phylogenetic comparative studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Determining the probability of hemiplasy in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting and introgression.Semantic proximity Read ↗

On phylogenetic tests of irreversible evolution.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The quality of the fossil record and the accuracy of phylogenetic inferences about sampling and diversity.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Applying species-tree analyses to deep phylogenetic histories: challenges and potential suggested from a survey of empirical phylogenetic studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.