Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Research participant interest in primary, secondary, and incidental genomic findings.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics - 1 Dec 2016

Loud Jennifer T, Bremer Renee C, Mai Phuong L, Peters June A, Giri Neelam, Stewart Douglas R, Greene Mark H, Alter Blanche P, Savage Sharon A

Abstract excerpt

PURPOSE: To define the frequency with which adult research participants consent to be offered clinically validated research genetic test results (RR) and incidental findings (IF). METHODS: Consents were obtained from 506 adults enrolled in one of three studies within the National Cancer Institute Clinical Genetics Branch's Familial Cancer Research Program. A cross-sectional analysis was performed involving the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Genetic Testing
Share to Genomics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Incidental Findings

Share to Mutation

Share to Neoplasms

Share to Parents

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 27101135
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2016.36
PMCID: PMC5074919

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Research participant interest in primary, secondary, and incidental genomic findings.PMID 27101135Read ↗

Informed consent for exome sequencing research in families with genetic disease: The emerging issue of incidental findingsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Attitudes of Canadian researchers toward the return to participants of incidental and targeted genomic findings obtained in a pediatric research settingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Incidental Findings with Genomic Testing: Implications for Genetic Counseling PracticeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Perspectives of clinical genetics professionals toward genome sequencing and incidental findings: a survey studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Informed consent for return of incidental findings in genomic researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Patient decisions for disclosure of secondary findings among the first 200 individuals undergoing clinical diagnostic exome sequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Do Researchers Have an Obligation to Actively Look for Genetic Incidental Findings?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Return of secondary genomic findings vs patient autonomy: implications for medical care.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Return of Results in Genomic Research Using Large-Scale or Whole Genome Sequencing: Toward a New NormalSemantic proximity Read ↗

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Understanding variations in secondary findings reporting practices across U.S. genome sequencing laboratoriesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Additional findings from the 100,000 Genomes Project: A qualitative study of recipient perspectives.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.