Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Contrasting Partners' Traits of Generalized and Specialized Species in Flower-Visitation Networks.

PloS one - 1 Jan 2016

Castro-Urgal Rocío, Traveset Anna

Abstract excerpt

Much ecological research has focused on trying to understand why species are generalized or specialized in their interactions and how networks develop in a certain environment. It is now well known that traits such as phenology and abundance of a species are important determinants of its generalization level (i.e., number of different interactions or links to other species). Less information is available,...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Ecosystem
Share to Flowers
Share to Insecta

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Pollination

Share to Reproduction

Share to Seasons

Share to Species Specificity

Share to Symbiosis

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 26938084
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150824
PMCID: PMC4777429

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Contrasting Partners' Traits of Generalized and Specialized Species in Flower-Visitation Networks.PMID 26938084Read ↗

Pollinator restoration in Brazilian ecosystems relies on a small but phylogenetically-diverse set of plant families.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Time-invariant differences between plant individuals in interactions with arthropods correlate with intraspecific variation in plant phenology, morphology and floral scent.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The influence of floral traits on specialization and modularity of plant-pollinator networks in a biodiversity hotspot in the Peruvian Andes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Phenotypic trait matching predicts the topology of an insular plant-bird pollination network.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Bats and hawkmoths form mixed modules with flowering plants in a nocturnal interaction networkSemantic proximity Read ↗

Nectar robbery by a hermit hummingbird: association to floral phenotype and its influence on flowers and network structure.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Traits and phylogenetic history contribute to network structure across Canadian plant-pollinator communities.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Coevolution and the architecture of mutualistic networks.Semantic proximity Read ↗

From Individuals to Networks: The Role of Variation in Plant-Pollinator Communities' Responses to Global ChangeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Pollinator Community Predicts Trait Matching between Oil-Producing Flowers and a Guild of Oil-Collecting Bees.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Using individual-based trait frequency distributions to forecast plant-pollinator network responses to environmental change.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Which, when, and where traits matter: functional trait-mediated species associations shift with microenvironmental and climatic variation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.