Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Is a New Standard Needed for Diffusion Methods for In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Fosfomycin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa?

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy - 1 Feb 2016

Díez-Aguilar María, Martínez-García Laura, Cantón Rafael, Morosini María Isabel

Abstract excerpt

We analyzed fosfomycin susceptibility results in Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates obtained by MIC gradient strips and disk diffusion methods using two different inocula, 10(8) and 10(6) CFU/ml, and compared them to the agar dilution reference method. Essential and categorical agreements were 93.6% and 95%, respectively, for the 10(6) CFU/ml alternative inoculum, and they were 67.6% and 78.2%,...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Anti-Bacterial Agents
Share to Fosfomycin

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Microbial Sensitivity Tests

Share to Mutation

Share to Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 26643341
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02237-15
PMCID: PMC4750655

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 8 closest

Is a New Standard Needed for Diffusion Methods for In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Fosfomycin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa?PMID 26643341Read ↗

Performance of Four Fosfomycin Susceptibility Testing Methods against an International Collection of Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa IsolatesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of different methods of determining beta-lactam susceptibility in clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Breakpoints for Predicting <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> Susceptibility to Inhaled Tobramycin in Cystic Fibrosis Patients: Use of High-Range Etest StripsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of disc susceptibility tests performed directly from positive blood culturesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of two commercial systems (Vitek and MicroScan-WalkAway) for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Performance of Vitek 2 in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with different mechanisms of beta-lactam resistance.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Probing fosfomycin's potential: a study on susceptibility testing and resistance in Staphylococcus epidermidis from prosthetic joint infections.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus spp.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.