Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 1: should NIPT routinely include microdeletions/microduplications?

22 Oct 2015

Abstract excerpt

What's already known about this topic? Technology is available to add microdeletion testing to cell free DNA screening. What does this study adds? This report summarizes an oral debate presented at the 19th International Conference on Prenatal Diagnosis and Therapy in Washington, DC, USA, on 14 July 2015. Through the debate, the benefits, limitations, and challenges of potential wide‐scale implementation of...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Share to Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 26492631
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4710

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 1: should NIPT routinely include microdeletions/microduplications?PMID 26492631Read ↗

Challenges in non‐invasive prenatal screening for sub‐chromosomal copy number variations using cell‐free DNASemantic proximity Read ↗

Noninvasive screening by cell‐free DNA for 22q11.2 deletion: Benefits, limitations, and challengesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Advances, Applications, and Limitations in Prenatal ScreeningSemantic proximity Read ↗

Maternal cell-free DNA–based screening for fetal microdeletion and the importance of careful diagnostic follow-upSemantic proximity Read ↗

Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 2: Cell‐free DNA prenatal screening should be used to identify all chromosome abnormalitiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of the clinical utility of extended non-invasive prenatal testing in the detection of chromosomal aneuploidy and microdeletion/microduplicationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical Potential of Expanded Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Detection of Aneuploidies and Microdeletion/Microduplication SyndromesSemantic proximity Read ↗

The performance evaluation of NIPT for fetal chromosome microdeletion/microduplication detection: a retrospective analysis of 68,588 Chinese casesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Non-invasive prenatal testing by low coverage genomic sequencing: Detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

The benefits and limitations of cell‐free DNA screening for 22q11.2 deletion syndromeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Current Status of Testing for Microdeletion Syndromes and Rare Autosomal Trisomies Using Cell-Free DNA TechnologySemantic proximity Read ↗

Prenatal Screening for Microdeletions and Rare Autosomal AneuploidiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.