Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparative Evaluation of Colistin Susceptibility Testing Methods among Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates

27 May 2015

Abstract excerpt

We compared six colistin susceptibility testing (ST) methods on 61 carbapenem-nonsusceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 41) and Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 20) clinical isolates with provisionally elevated colistin MICs by routine ST. Colistin MICs were determined by broth microdilution (BMD), BMD with 0.002% polysorbate 80 (P80) (BMD-P80), agar dilution (AD), Etest, Vitek2, and MIC test strip (MTS). BMD was...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Share to Enterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter Research
Share to Urinary Tract Infections Management

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 26014928
DOI: 10.1128/aac.00868-15

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparative Evaluation of Colistin Susceptibility Testing Methods among Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical IsolatesPMID 26014928Read ↗

Susceptibility Testing of Colistin for Acinetobacter baumannii: How Far Are We from the Truth?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of Vitek®2 performance for colistin susceptibility testing for Gram-negative isolatesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of colistin susceptibility by four phenotypic methods compared to broth microdilution in multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of disc diffusion, Etest and agar dilution for susceptibility testing of colistin against EnterobacteriaceaeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of Colistin Susceptibility in Carbapenem‐Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates Using Broth Microdilution, MICRONAUT‐MIC‐Strip, and VITEK MSSemantic proximity Read ↗

AGREEMENT AND ERROR RATES IN ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING FOR THREE COMMERCIAL AUTOMATED SYSTEMS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW AND META-ANALYSISSemantic proximity Read ↗

Reliability of various antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for piperacillin/tazobactam in challenging Escherichia coli isolatesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Disc Diffusion and ComASP® Cefiderocol Microdilution Panel to Overcome the Challenge of Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Laboratory RoutineSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of cefiderocol disk diffusion versus broth microdilution results when tested against Acinetobacter baumannii complex clinical isolatesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Detection of Colistin Resistance in Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae by Reference Broth Microdilution and Comparative Evaluation of Three Other MethodsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Reliability of the E-Test Method for Detection of Colistin Resistance in Clinical Isolates of <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Search for a Practical Method for Colistin Susceptibility Testing: Have We Found It by Going Back to the Future?Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.