Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Asymmetrical sexual isolation but no postmating isolation between the closely related species Drosophila suboccidentalis and Drosophila occidentalis.

BMC evolutionary biology - 12 Mar 2015

Arthur Nicholas J, Dyer Kelly A

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: During the speciation process several types of isolating barriers can arise that limit gene flow between diverging populations. Studying recently isolated species can inform our understanding of how and when these barriers arise, and which barriers may be most important to limiting gene flow. Here we focus on Drosophila suboccidentalis and D. occidentalis, which are closely related mushroom-feeding...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Drosophila
Share to Gene Flow
Share to Hybridization, Genetic

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to North America

Share to Reproductive Isolation

Share to Sexual Behavior, Animal

Share to Species Specificity

Share to Spermatozoa

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 25881167
DOI: 10.1186/s12862-015-0328-y
PMCID: PMC4369358

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Asymmetrical sexual isolation but no postmating isolation between the closely related species Drosophila suboccidentalis and Drosophila occidentalis.PMID 25881167Read ↗

How Important Is Sexual Isolation to Speciation?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Multiple pre- and postzygotic components of reproductive isolation between two co-occurring Lysimachia species.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The polymorphic prelude to Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Ecological divergence associated with mating system causes nearly complete reproductive isolation between sympatric Mimulus species.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reproductive isolation of hybrid populations driven by genetic incompatibilities.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Postzygotic isolation over multiple generations of hybrid descendents in a natural hybrid zone: how well do single-generation estimates reflect reproductive isolation?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evolution of sexual isolation in laboratory populations: fitness differences between mating types and the associated hybrid incompatibilities.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The genetics of reproductive isolation and the potential for gene exchange between Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis via backcross hybrid males.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Floral isolation is the main reproductive barrier among closely related sexually deceptive orchids.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Incipient sexual isolation among cosmopolitan Drosophila melanogaster populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patterns of postmating reproductive isolation in a newly discovered species pair, Aquarius remigis and A. remigoides (Hemiptera;Gerridae).Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.