Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for carcass merit traits in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.

Animal genetics - 1 Feb 2015

Chen L, Vinsky M, Li C

Abstract excerpt

Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for carcass merit traits including hot carcass weight, longissimus muscle area (REA), carcass average backfat thickness (AFAT), lean meat yield (LMY) and carcass marbling score (CMAR) was evaluated based on 543 Angus and 400 Charolais steers genotyped on the Illumina BovineSNP50 Beadchip. For the genomic prediction within Angus, the average accuracy was 0.35 with a...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Bayes Theorem
Share to Body Composition
Share to Body Weight

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Breeding

Share to Cattle

Share to Linear Models

Share to Quantitative Trait, Heritable

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 25393962
DOI: 10.1111/age.12238

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for carcass merit traits in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.PMID 25393962Read ↗

Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of molecular breeding values based on within- and across-breed training in beef cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The impact of training strategies on the accuracy of genomic predictors in United States Red Angus cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic Prediction of Meat Tenderness in Nellore Cattle: Multi-Trait and Weighted Single-Step Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction Approaches.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values from pure-breed and across-breed predictions in Australian beef cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of genomic breeding values and accuracy for carcass traits in Korean Hanwoo cows using whole-genome SNP chip panels.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction in French Charolais beef cattle using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Bias, dispersion, and accuracy of genomic predictions for feedlot and carcase traits in Australian Angus steers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Performances of Adaptive MultiBLUP, Bayesian regressions, and weighted-GBLUP approaches for genomic predictions in Belgian Blue beef cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The accuracies of DNA-based estimates of genetic merit derived from Angus or multibreed beef cattle training populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improving Breeding Value Reliability with Genomic Data in Breeding Groups of Charolais.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.