Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Pregnant couples at increased risk for common aneuploidies choose maximal information from invasive genetic testing

19 Aug 2014

Abstract excerpt

Genomic array detects more pathogenic chromosome aberrations than conventional karyotyping (CK), including genetic variants associated with a susceptibility for neurodevelopmental disorders; susceptibility loci (SL). Consensus regarding the scope of invasive prenatal diagnosis (PND) pregnant couples should be offered is lacking. This study examined pregnant couples' preferences, doubts and satisfaction regarding...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Share to Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 25134982
DOI: 10.1111/cge.12479

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Pregnant couples at increased risk for common aneuploidies choose maximal information from invasive genetic testingPMID 25134982Read ↗

Decision-Making for Prenatal Genetic Screening: How will Pregnant Women Navigate a Growing Number of Aneuploidy and Carrier Screening Options?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic counselling and ethical issues with chromosome microarray analysis in prenatal testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Patient attitudes and preferences about expanded noninvasive prenatal testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

An Exploration of Genetic Counselors’ Needs and Experiences with Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray TestingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Receiving uncertain results from prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis: Women's decisions on continuation or termination of pregnancySemantic proximity Read ↗

Ethical considerations in prenatal genomic testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

How to deal with uncertainty in prenatal genomics: A systematic review of guidelines and policies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Physicians' perspectives on the uncertainties and implications of chromosomal microarray testing of children and familiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

“Something Extra on Chromosome 5”: Parents’ Understanding of Positive Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) ResultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Balancing Genetics (Science) and Counseling (Art) in Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray TestingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Ethical considerations in prenatal testing: Genomic testing and medical uncertaintySemantic proximity Read ↗

Qualifying choice: ethical reflection on the scope of prenatal screeningSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.