Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations?

Journal of dairy science - 1 Jan 2014

Lourenco D A L, Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Aguilar I, Lawlor T J, Forni S, Weller J I

Abstract excerpt

Data sets of US Holsteins, Israeli Holsteins, and pigs from PIC (a Genus company, Hendersonville, TN) were used to evaluate the effect of different numbers of generations on ability to predict genomic breeding values of young genotyped animals. The influence of including only 2 generations of ancestors (A2) or all ancestors (Af) was also investigated. A total of 34,506 US Holsteins, 1,305 Israeli Holsteins, and...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Cattle
Share to Genomics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Israel

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Pedigree

Share to United States

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 24679931
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-7769

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations?PMID 24679931Read ↗

Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of truncating historical data on prediction ability of dairy sheep selection candidates.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Determining the stability of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values in future generations in commercial pig populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Changes in genomic predictions when new information is added.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Indirect predictions with a large number of genotyped animals using the algorithm for proven and young.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: genomic evaluations of final score for US Holsteins benefit from the inclusion of genotypes on cows.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits in Animal Breeding with Long Breeding History, the Dairy Cattle Case.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assigning unknown parent groups to reduce bias in genomic evaluations of final score in US Holsteins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Unknown parent groups and truncated pedigree in single-step genomic evaluations of Murrah buffaloes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Core-dependent changes in genomic predictions using the Algorithm for Proven and Young in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.