Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Selection for complex traits leaves little or no classic signatures of selection.

BMC genomics - 28 Mar 2014

Kemper Kathryn E, Saxton Sarah J, Bolormaa Sunduimijid, Hayes Benjamin J, Goddard Michael E

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Selection signatures aim to identify genomic regions underlying recent adaptations in populations. However, the effects of selection in the genome are difficult to distinguish from random processes, such as genetic drift. Often associations between selection signatures and selected variants for complex traits is assumed even though this is rarely (if ever) tested. In this paper, we use 8 breeds of...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Cattle
Share to Genome

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Homozygote

Share to Multifactorial Inheritance

Share to Quantitative Trait, Heritable

Share to Selection, Genetic

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 24678841
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-246
PMCID: PMC3986643

Genes

FST

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Selection for complex traits leaves little or no classic signatures of selection.PMID 24678841Read ↗

A genome-wide scan for signatures of differential artificial selection in ten cattle breeds.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Identification of selective sweeps reveals divergent selection between Chinese Holstein and Simmental cattle populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Using singleton densities to detect recent selection in <i>Bos taurus</i>Semantic proximity Read ↗

Classic selective sweeps revealed by massive sequencing in cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Composite selection signals can localize the trait specific genomic regions in multi-breed populations of cattle and sheep.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Revealing the selection history of adaptive loci using genome-wide scans for selection: an example from domestic sheep.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Properties of different selection signature statistics and a new strategy for combining them.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Application of site and haplotype-frequency based approaches for detecting selection signatures in cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cross-population selection signatures in Canchim composite beef cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Detection of selection signatures in dairy and beef cattle using high-density genomic information.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Signatures of selection in riverine buffalo populations revealed by genome-wide SNP data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Composite Selection Signals for Complex Traits Exemplified Through Bovine Stature Using Multibreed Cohorts of European and African Bos taurus.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.