Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

A function accounting for training set size and marker density to model the average accuracy of genomic prediction.

PloS one - 1 Jan 2013

Erbe Malena, Gredler Birgit, Seefried Franz Reinhold, Bapst Beat, Simianer Henner

Abstract excerpt

Prediction of genomic breeding values is of major practical relevance in dairy cattle breeding. Deterministic equations have been suggested to predict the accuracy of genomic breeding values in a given design which are based on training set size, reliability of phenotypes, and the number of independent chromosome segments ([Formula: see text]). The aim of our study was to find a general deterministic equation for...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Cattle
Share to Dairying

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genomics

Share to Genotyping Techniques

Share to Likelihood Functions

Share to Models, Statistical

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 24339895
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081046
PMCID: PMC3855218

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

A function accounting for training set size and marker density to model the average accuracy of genomic prediction.PMID 24339895Read ↗

Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accuracy of genomic prediction using low-density marker panels.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Optimizing genomic prediction for Australian Red dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

An Equation to Predict the Accuracy of Genomic Values by Combining Data from Multiple Traits, Populations, or Environments.Semantic proximity Read ↗

On the limited increase in validation reliability using high-density genotypes in genomic best linear unbiased prediction: observations from Fleckvieh cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction in French Charolais beef cattle using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The accuracy of Genomic Selection in Norwegian red cattle assessed by cross-validation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: Genomic prediction using different single-step methods in the Finnish red dairy cattle population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Using the genomic relationship matrix to predict the accuracy of genomic selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (∼54,000) and high-density (∼777,000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: Reliability of single-step genomic BLUP breeding values by multi-trait test-day model analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.