Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

A new multiplex SNP genotyping assay for detecting hybridization and introgression between the M and S molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae.

Molecular ecology resources - 1 Mar 2014

Lee Yoosook, Marsden Clare D, Nieman Catelyn, Lanzaro Gregory C

Abstract excerpt

The M and S forms of Anopheles gambiae have been the subject of intense study, but are morphologically indistinguishable and can only be identified using molecular techniques. PCR-based assays to distinguish the two forms have been designed and applied widely. However, the application of these assays towards identifying hybrids between the two forms, and backcrossed hybrids in particular, has been problematic as...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Anopheles
Share to Chimera
Share to Genotyping Techniques

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Inbreeding

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 24119184
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12181
PMCID: PMC3947471

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

A new multiplex SNP genotyping assay for detecting hybridization and introgression between the M and S molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae.PMID 24119184Read ↗

Breakdown in the process of incipient speciation in Anopheles gambiae.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Asymmetric introgression between the M and S forms of the malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae, maintains divergence despite extensive hybridization.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Gene flow-dependent genomic divergence between Anopheles gambiae M and S forms.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparative analyses reveal discrepancies among results of commonly used methods for Anopheles gambiaemolecular form identification.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patterns of genomic differentiation between ecologically differentiated M and S forms of Anopheles gambiae in West and Central Africa.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Spatiotemporal dynamics of gene flow and hybrid fitness between the M and S forms of the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The “Far-West” of Anopheles gambiae Molecular FormsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Insertion polymorphisms of SINE200 retrotransposons within speciation islands of Anopheles gambiae molecular formsSemantic proximity Read ↗

High Genetic Differentiation between the M and S Molecular Forms of Anopheles gambiae in AfricaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evidence of introgression of the ace-1(R) mutation and of the ace-1 duplication in West African Anopheles gambiae s. s.Semantic proximity Read ↗

No evidence for biased co-transmission of speciation islands in Anopheles gambiae.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Contemporary gene flow between wild An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.