Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

The influence of pollinator phylogeography and mate preference on floral divergence in a sexually deceptive daisy.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution - 1 Jun 2013

de Jager Marinus L, Ellis Allan G

Abstract excerpt

Divergent mate preferences and subsequent genetic differentiation between populations has been demonstrated, but its effects on interspecific interactions are unknown. Associated species exploiting these mate preferences, for example, may diverge to match local preferences. We explore this idea in the sexually deceptive, fly-mimicking daisy, Gorteria diffusa, by testing for association between genetic structure...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Asteraceae
Share to Diptera
Share to Feeding Behavior

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Flowers

Share to Mating Preference, Animal

Share to Phylogeography

Share to Pollination

Share to Population

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 23730763
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12070

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The influence of pollinator phylogeography and mate preference on floral divergence in a sexually deceptive daisy.PMID 23730763Read ↗

Floral trait variation and integration as a function of sexual deception in Gorteria diffusa.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Divergence in mate choice systems: does evolution play by rules?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic distance and pollinator sharing shape divergence in floral volatiles in closely related dioecious Ficus species.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Phylogenetic inference of nuptial trait evolution in the context of asymmetrical introgression in North American darters (teleostei).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pollinator mosaics mirror floral trait divergence within and between species of <i>Castilleja</i>Semantic proximity Read ↗

Phenotypic integration in style dimorphic daffodils (Narcissus, Amaryllidaceae) with different pollinators.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Dimorphic flowers modify the visitation order of pollinators from male to female flowers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Phylogeography of pollinator-specific sexually deceptive Chiloglottis taxa (Orchidaceae): evidence for sympatric divergence?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of pollination syndromes in Antillean Gesneriaceae: evidence for bat, hummingbird and generalized flowersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Explaining evolutionary shifts between bee and hummingbird pollination: convergence, divergence, and directionality.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pre-adaptations and the evolution of pollination by sexual deception: Cope's rule of specialization revisited.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Complex interactions underlie the correlated evolution of floral traits and their association with pollinators in a clade with diverse pollination systems.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.