Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Point-counterpoint. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics.

Science (New York, N.Y.) - 31 May 2013

Wolf Susan M, Annas George J, Elias Sherman

Abstract excerpt

No abstract is available from the source.

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Share to Disease
Share to Ethics in Clinical Research
Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genomics

Share to Incidental Findings

Share to Practice Guidelines as Topic

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 23686341
DOI: 10.1126/science.1239119
PMCID: PMC3721305

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Point-counterpoint. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics.PMID 23686341Read ↗

Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Incidental findings in clinical genomics: a clarification.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Mandatory extended searches in all genome sequencing: "incidental findings," patient autonomy, and shared decision making.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Paternalism and the ACMG recommendations on genomic incidental findings: patients seen but not heardSemantic proximity Read ↗

Return of secondary genomic findings vs patient autonomy: implications for medical care.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genome editing in clinical genetics: points to consider—a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and GenomicsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetics specialists’ perspectives on disclosure of genomic incidental findings in the clinical settingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Secondary findings: How did we get here, and where are we going?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Informed consent for return of incidental findings in genomic researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Incidental variants are critical for genomics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Points to consider in the reevaluation and reanalysis of genomic test results: a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)Semantic proximity Read ↗

Why mutation analysis does not always predict clinical consequences: explanations in the era of genomics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.