Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Confirmatory and competitive evaluation of alternative gene-environment interaction hypotheses.

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines - 1 Oct 2013

Belsky Jay, Pluess Michael, Widaman Keith F

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Most gene-environment interaction (GXE) research, though based on clear, vulnerability-oriented hypotheses, is carried out using exploratory rather than hypothesis-informed statistical tests, limiting power and making formal evaluation of competing GXE propositions difficult. METHOD: We present and illustrate a new regression technique which affords direct testing of theory-derived predictions, as...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Biomedical Research
Share to Child Behavior Disorders

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Child, Preschool

Share to Gene-Environment Interaction

Share to Infant

Share to Receptors, Dopamine D4

Share to Research Design

Share to Social Behavior

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 23617948
DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12075

Genes

DRD4

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Confirmatory and competitive evaluation of alternative gene-environment interaction hypotheses.PMID 23617948Read ↗

The hidden efficacy of interventions: gene×environment experiments from a differential susceptibility perspective.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Gene-by-Environment Interactions in Human Individual DifferencesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Differential susceptibility 2.0: Are the same children affected by different experiences and exposures?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Parent and youth dopamine D4 receptor genotypes moderate multilevel contextual effects on rural African American youth's risk behavior.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Beyond Vulnerability: Attachment, Adversity, Gene-Environment Interaction, and Implications for Intervention.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Beyond diathesis stress: differential susceptibility to environmental influences.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Research Review: genetic vulnerability or differential susceptibility in child development: the case of attachment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic moderation of contextual effects on negative arousal and parenting in African-American parents.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Gene X environment interactions in reading disability and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic moderation of early child-care effects on social functioning across childhood: a developmental analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Gene-environment interaction and the intergenerational transmission of parenting: testing the differential-susceptibility hypothesis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The ADAPT Parenting Intervention Benefits Combat Exposed Fathers Genetically Susceptible to Problem Drinking.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.