Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Relative accuracy of three common methods of parentage analysis in natural populations.

Molecular ecology - 1 Feb 2013

Harrison Hugo B, Saenz-Agudelo Pablo, Planes Serge, Jones Geoffrey P, Berumen Michael L

Abstract excerpt

Parentage studies and family reconstructions have become increasingly popular for investigating a range of evolutionary, ecological and behavioural processes in natural populations. However, a number of different assignment methods have emerged in common use and the accuracy of each may differ in relation to the number of loci examined, allelic diversity, incomplete sampling of all candidate parents and the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Bayes Theorem
Share to Computer Simulation
Share to Genetics, Population

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genotype

Share to Likelihood Functions

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Software

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 23278953
DOI: 10.1111/mec.12138

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Relative accuracy of three common methods of parentage analysis in natural populations.PMID 23278953Read ↗

Bayesian parentage analysis with systematic accountability of genotyping error, missing data and false matching.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparing parentage inference software: reanalysis of a red deer pedigree.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessing parent numbers from offspring genotypes: the importance of marker polymorphism.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Using genomic relationship likelihood for parentage assignment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Maximum likelihood parentage assignment using quantitative genotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A comparative assessment of SNP and microsatellite markers for assigning parentage in a socially monogamous bird.Semantic proximity Read ↗

How Well Do Molecular and Pedigree Relatedness Correspond, in Populations with Diverse Mating Systems, and Various Types and Quantities of Molecular and Demographic Data?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparing the performance of analytical techniques for genetic PARENTAGE of half-sib progeny arrays.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The potential costs of accounting for genotypic errors in molecular parentage analyses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Do marker-based paternity assignments favour heterozygous and unrelated males?Semantic proximity Read ↗

How many markers are enough? Factors influencing parentage testing in different livestock populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.