Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Differential competitive ability between sexes in the dioecious Antennaria dioica (Asteraceae).

Annals of botany - 1 Nov 2012

Varga Sandra, Kytöviita Minna-Maarit

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Differences in competitive ability between the sexes of dioecious plants are expected as a result of allocation trade-offs associated with sex-differential reproductive costs. However, the available data on competitive ability in dioecious plants are scarce and contradictory. In this study sexual competition was evaluated using the dioecious plant Antennaria dioica in a common garden...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Asteraceae
Share to Biomass
Share to Flowers

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Mycorrhizae

Share to Plant Shoots

Share to Reproduction, Asexual

Share to Symbiosis

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 22887023
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcs170
PMCID: PMC3489148

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Differential competitive ability between sexes in the dioecious Antennaria dioica (Asteraceae).PMID 22887023Read ↗

Life-history trade-offs promote the evolution of dioecy.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Females make tough neighbors: sex-specific competitive effects in seedlings of a dioecious grass.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Polygamy or subdioecy? The impact of diallelic self-incompatibility on the sexual system in Fraxinus excelsior (Oleaceae).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Belowground Competition Can Influence the Evolution of Root Traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reproductive allocation and costs in gynodioecious Leucopogon melaleucoides (Ericaceae): implications for the evolution of gender dimorphism.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Plant architecture, plasticity, and adaptation strategies of two oat genotypes under different competition intensities.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Influence of reproductive traits on pollination success in two Daphne species (Thymelaeaceae).Semantic proximity Read ↗

New Evidence Suggests No Sex Bias in Herbivory or Plant Defense.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Influence of inflorescence size on sexual expression and female reproductive success in a monoecious species.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Increased maleness at flowering stage and femaleness at fruiting stage with size in an andromonoecious perennial, Veratrum nigrum.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Kin recognition, not competitive interactions, predicts root allocation in young Cakile edentula seedling pairs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Does the silver moss Bryum argenteum exhibit sex-specific patterns in vegetative growth rate, asexual fitness or prezygotic reproductive investment?Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.