Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Is maternal parity an independent risk factor for birth defects?

Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology - 1 Apr 2012

Duong Hao T, Hoyt Adrienne T, Carmichael Suzan L, Gilboa Suzanne M, Canfield Mark A, Case Amy, McNeese Melanie L, Waller Dorothy Kim

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Although associations between maternal parity and birth defects have been observed previously, few studies have focused on the possibility that parity is an independent risk factor for birth defects. We investigated the relation between levels of parity and a range of birth defects, adjusting each defect group for the same covariates. METHODS: We included infants who had an estimated delivery date...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Case-Control Studies
Share to Congenital Abnormalities

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Heart Defects, Congenital

Share to Odds Ratio

Share to Parity

Share to Pregnancy

Share to Pregnancy Complications

Share to Young Adult

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 22371332
DOI: 10.1002/bdra.22889
PMCID: PMC4476024

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Is maternal parity an independent risk factor for birth defects?PMID 22371332Read ↗

Etiology and clinical presentation of birth defects: population based studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Sex ratios among infants with birth defects, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2009Semantic proximity Read ↗

Causes of Congenital MalformationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Differences in the success of prenatal diagnosis of birth defects associated with singleton and multiple pregnancies: an observational study of more than 1.9 million births in Zhejiang Province, eastern China, during 2012–2018Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patterns of multiple congenital anomalies in the National Birth Defect Prevention Study: Challenges and insightsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Maternal Age, Parity and Isolated Birth Defects: A Population-Based Case-Control Study in Shenzhen, ChinaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Risk Factors for Intrauterine Growth Restriction and Its Neonatal OutcomeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Role of structural birth defects in preterm delivery.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prevalence, Correlates, and Outcomes of Omphalocele in the United States, 1995–2005Semantic proximity Read ↗

Fetal phenotypes and neonatal and early childhood outcomes in twins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sex ratio and associated risk factors for 50 congenital anomaly types: Clues for causal heterogeneitySemantic proximity Read ↗

Congenital Heart Defects and Indices of Placental and Fetal Growth in a Nationwide Study of 924 422 Liveborn InfantsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.