Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Sex ratios among infants with birth defects, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2009

25 Feb 2015

Abstract excerpt

A small number of population-based studies have examined sex differences among infants with birth defects. This study presents estimates of sex ratio for both isolated cases and those with multiple congenital anomalies, as well as by race/ethnicity. Male-female sex ratios and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated for 25,952 clinically reviewed case infants included in the National Birth Defects...

Topics

Join the communities discussing this publication.

Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Global Maternal and Child Health
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Source

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Identifiers

PMID: 25711982
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36865

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 1 Sept 2026.

Community interpretation

Discuss the evidence

Ask a question, add context or challenge an interpretation. Community activity is separate from scientific evidence strength.

0

discussions

0

replies

Citations encouraged

Claims remain attributable.

No discussion yet

Be the first to add a careful, cited interpretation.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Sex ratios among infants with birth defects, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2009PMID 25711982Read ↗

Sex and congenital malformations: An international perspectiveSemantic proximity Read ↗

Patterns of multiple congenital anomalies in the National Birth Defect Prevention Study: Challenges and insightsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Sex differences in the prevalence of congenital anomalies: A population-based studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Orofacial clefts in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2004Semantic proximity Read ↗

Etiology and clinical presentation of birth defects: population based studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Congenital anomalies associated with trisomy 18 or trisomy 13: A registry‐based study in 16 european countries, 2000–2011Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sex ratio and associated risk factors for 50 congenital anomaly types: Clues for causal heterogeneitySemantic proximity Read ↗

Maternal Age, Parity and Isolated Birth Defects: A Population-Based Case-Control Study in Shenzhen, ChinaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Congenital malformationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Causes of Congenital MalformationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Birth defects data from population‐based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States, 2007 to 2011: Highlighting orofacial cleftsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Differences in the success of prenatal diagnosis of birth defects associated with singleton and multiple pregnancies: an observational study of more than 1.9 million births in Zhejiang Province, eastern China, during 2012–2018Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.